08 December 2004Musings
Is America the Best Place to Live in the World?
Absolutely not, if you ask me, but my guess is that most Americans wouldn't agree with me.
I had an epiphany about this while I was sitting in a huge international food court at lunch yesterday. You could get food from almost any cuisine in the world. It was incredibly convenient, but the quality was sub-par (even while the quantity was more than sufficient).
It comes down to what you value. If you value convenience or quantity over quality then America is the best place for you. But if you value quality, style, or substance, then you'd have to look elsewhere.
Posted by andrew at December 8, 2004 03:21 PM
Where to start...
You could take almost every aspect of American life at the moment (except convenience) and find a better alternative in another country. Whether it's education where the cost goes up while the quality goes down, agriculture where increasingly our factory produced food tastes like nothing to the environment which is under attack because, well, it's bad for business. We used to have the best health care system in the world. Now HCA's are shutting down hospitals that are not profitable.
Over the course of this century we've traded in quality as our number one value and exchanged for quantity. We used to make the best cars in the world. Now we just make the most. Our artists are lauded not for the quality of their work, but for the quantity of their sales.
When quantity equals quality you have a serious crisis. When people go out to eat and get massive portions of food for very little money, very few question the system that brought that food to their table. When people shop at Walmart, they are happy to have the amazing quantity of goods available to them at low prices. They don't question the value system or the ramifications that makes it possible for them to buy a 27" TV for 150 bucks. They just buy it.
Everywhere I look, I see quantity as the principle that guides people. There are exceptions of course, but this is the general trend. Hopefully it's not irreversible.
Where would I move?
Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Holland. Anywhere in Scandanavia. Those are just the places where I could move with little change in lifestyle but a huge improvement in quality of life. If I want to consider more simple places, I could add dozens more.
Just to take one example, public education is far better in any of these countries than it is here. If I had a choice to put my kids in an American public school or one in Sweden, do you think I would hesistate for a second to move to Scandavia? Have you ever met someone from Sweden? They are so overeducated in comparison to Americans, it's a joke. Hopefully I will be able to afford private school for my kids or can manage to move to one of the few school districts in California that has decent schools, which is becoming fewer and fewer and harder and harder as school continue to fail and real estate sky rockets in districts that value education.
At the college level, I have watched as fees for the UC System have soared out of control. It now costs at least three times as much to go to the University of California then it did when attended less than ten years ago. In Australia, college is no longer free, but it still costs less than our community college system. And their public universities are just as good or better than ours. I spent a year at the University of Melbourne. I was blown away by the quality of professors and the demands on the students. Classes were far more difficult, in my field (Classics) at least, and the students were far more advanced because of it.
At the moment, my biggest problem with the US is the losing battle that substance is waging against style. This is why Las Vegas is such a popular vacation spot and people think they've seen the world if they visited Epcot Center and places like the food court where I had this epiphany are so en vogue. Of course, there are food courts in other countries, but there is an understanding that these places are utilitarian, a last option. Whereas in this country, it's the often the best option.
It's important to understand that I'm not some America hater. I love this country. I just think not only could it be a much better place because it has been, but also that we're on a slippery slope in a dangerous direction in so many aspects of our society that once people realize what's going on, it might be too late to alter course. It might be too late now.
From:
http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2004/11/15/europe/
As Jeremy Rifkin argues in his dense and contentious new research-driven tome "The European Dream," the United States remains ahead in per-capita GDP, but the difference is not as significant as it looks.
Much of American "productivity," Rifkin suggests, is accounted for by economic activity that might be better described as wasteful: military spending; the endlessly expanding police and prison bureaucracies; the spiraling cost of healthcare; suburban sprawl; the fast-food industry and its inevitable corollary, the weight-loss craze. Meaningful comparisons of living standards, he says, consistently favor the Europeans. In France, for instance, the work week is 35 hours and most employees take 10 to 12 weeks off every year, factors that clearly depress GDP. Yet it takes a John Locke heart of stone to say that France is worse off as a nation for all that time people spend in the countryside downing du vin rouge et du Camembert with friends and family.
More...
Whatever your intellectual and emotional responses may be to this burgeoning transatlantic conflict, it's difficult for any American to read Rifkin's book and not feel ashamed. The U.S. has fallen significantly behind the EU's Western European nations in infant mortality and life expectancy, despite spending more on healthcare per capita than any of them. (While 40 million Americans are uninsured, no one in Europe -- I repeat, not a single person -- lacks some form of healthcare coverage.)
European children are consistently better educated; the United States would rank ninth in the EU in reading, ninth in scientific literacy, and 13th in math. Twenty-two percent of American children grow up in poverty, which means that our country ranks 22nd out of the 23 industrialized nations, ahead of only Mexico and behind all 15 of the pre-2004 EU countries. What's more horrifying: the statistic itself or the fact that no American politician to the right of Dennis Kucinich would ever address it?
Perhaps more surprisingly, European business has not been strangled by the EU welfare state; in fact, quite the opposite is true. Europe has surpassed the United States in several high-tech and financial sectors, including wireless technology, grid computing and the insurance industry. The EU has a higher proportion of small businesses than the U.S., and their success rate is higher. American capitalists have begun to pay attention to all this. In Reid's book, Ford Motor Co. chairman Bill Ford explains that the company's Volvo subsidiary is more profitable than its U.S. manufacturing operation, even though wages and benefits are significantly higher in Sweden. Government-subsidized healthcare, child care, pensions and other social supports, Ford says, more than make up for the difference.
The new EU constitution, currently being considered by the member states, is an unwieldy, jargon-laden document that runs to 265 pages in English (and even more in Spanish and French). It should also serve as an inspiration to progressives around the world. It bars capital punishment in all 25 nations and defines such things as universal healthcare, child care, paid annual leave, parental leave, housing for the poor, and equal treatment for gays and lesbians as fundamental human rights. Most of these are still hotly contested questions in the United States; as Rifkin says, this document all by itself makes the European Union the world leader in the human rights debate. It is the first governing document that aspires to universality, "with rights and responsibilities that encompass the totality of human existence on Earth."
While Rifkin and Reid are unabashed Euro-boosters, both would urge Kerry voters rendered starry-eyed by the EU dream to ponder long and hard before pleading for asylum at the nearest consulate or scouring your family tree for relevant European ancestry. (Speaking as a dual-passport holder myself, I'm sticking it out -- at least for now.) For all the grandeur of its new vision, Europe still has relatively high unemployment and relatively sluggish economic growth. The continent faces major structural problems, most notably a declining birth rate and a long-standing hostility to immigration, which has led to a population that is aging much faster than America's. While the European welfare state is certain to remain generous by American standards, significant renegotiation of rights and benefits will be necessary unless this demographic time bomb can somehow be defused.
Despite its deepening inequality, the United States remains to a large extent a more dynamic and less class-bound society, and it still offers individuals that opportunity for constant reinvention that lies at the heart of our national dream.
The full article is a pretty good read that I'd recommend.
The article also has some interesting things on the consumer culture stuff you were talking about.
TrackBack URL for this entry: Listed below are links to weblogs that reference:
http://www.americanidle.org/MT/mt-tb.cgi/930
'Is America the Best Place to Live in the World?'.
i'm not convinced.
be more specific...